top of page
  • Writer's pictureSharad Nagpal

Unveiling the Distinctions Between Joint Tenancy and Tenancy in Common

tenancy and tenancy in common


Understanding the differences between various co-ownership arrangements is essential when it comes to property ownership. Tenancy in common and joint tenancy are two popular forms of property ownership in India. Despite the fact that they both include co-ownership, they have different characteristics and are subject to different laws of Indian property laws. Join me as we examine the main distinctions between joint tenancy and tenancy in common to get insightful legal knowledge.

Section 1: Joint Tenancy

1.1 Definition and Characteristics:

A joint tenancy is a form of property ownership in which two or more people each own an equal part of a piece of real estate. The right of survivorship is what distinguishes joint tenancy. Simply put, this indicates that the surviving joint tenants automatically inherit the deceased joint tenant's portion of the property.

1.2 Provision under Indian Property Law:

The Transfer of Property Act passed in 1882, governs joint tenancy in India. This Act's Section 44 acknowledges the right of survivorship in joint tenancies. According to this clause, the interest in the property falls to the surviving joint tenants rather than the decedent's heirs upon the death of a joint tenant.

Section 2: Tenancy in Common

2.1 Definition and Characteristics:

Tenancy in common, on the other hand, refers to co-ownership in which many people each have an undivided interest in a piece of property. Unlike joint tenancy, there is no right of survivorship in common. Each tenant in common is free to dispose of their portion on their own terms, and their part will pass to their heirs at death.

2.2 Indian Property Law Provision:

The Transfer of Property Act, of 1882, does not specifically recognize tenancy in common in India. However, Section 19 of the Act implies the acknowledgment of tenancy in common by hinting that a property may be owned and possessed concurrently by many people.

Section 3: Key Differences

3.1 Right of Survivorship:

The right of survivorship is where joint tenancy and tenancy in common differ most noticeably. This right is part of joint tenancy, ensuring that the shares of the deceased joint tenants are transferred to the remaining joint tenants. The portion of a deceased tenant in common is inherited by their heirs under tenancy in common, which lacks the right of survivorship.

3.2 Unity of Time, Title, Interest, and Possession:

For a property to be held in joint tenancy, both co-owners must have purchased it at the same time, under the same title, with equal interests, and with an equal right to possess the entire property. Co-owners in a tenancy in common might obtain their shares at various points in time, through various titles, with various interests, and with the right to possess particular areas of the property.

3.3 Alienation of Shares:

Joint tenants in a joint tenancy are prohibited from independently transferring or selling their shares without the other joint tenants' approval. But with a tenancy in common, each tenant is free to transfer or sell their portion without the other tenants' consent.

3.4 Partition:

The capacity to seek partition is an additional noteworthy feature. Joint tenants cannot independently seek the division of the property because doing so would result in the end of their joint tenancy. In contrast, in a tenancy in common arrangement, any co-owner may request partition. The property is divided into separate parcels or sold, with the money going to the co-owners.

Section 4: IPC

4.1 Trespass and Misappropriation:

Under Section 441 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), it is trespass if a co-owner of a joint tenancy or tenancy in common unlawfully accesses or occupies the property without the approval of the other co-owners. Similarly, charges under IPC Section 403 (misappropriation of property) may be brought against a co-owner if they misappropriate the common property or illegally sell the shares of other co-owners.

4.2 Fraud and Cheating:

According to IPC Section 420, it may constitute fraud if a co-owner deceptively causes other co-owners to transfer their shares or falsifies property documentation for personal gain. The IPC Section may also apply if a co-owner defrauds others by dishonestly disposing of the property or by hiding crucial information about ownership.

4.3 Criminal Trespass and Mischief:

Under IPC Section 447, it may be criminal trespass when a co-owner accesses the property against their will or damages common property. In addition, it could be considered mischief under IPC Section 425 if a co-owner purposefully damages or destroys the common property.


As lawyers, it is imperative that we give our clients a thorough explanation of the distinctions between joint tenancy and tenancy in common. Individuals can make educated decisions about their property ownership structure by being familiar with these distinctions and the laws of Indian property law. Additionally, being knowledgeable about the pertinent sections of the Indian Penal Code guarantees that people are prepared to defend their rights and deal with any legal complexities that may arise in co-ownership arrangements.

50 views0 comments


bottom of page